On 5/23/06, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jim Gifford wrote:
> The bottom line is if it's Alex or Dan, it needs it's own repo. With
> branches for LFS and CLFS, so if we make some changes, then Alex or Dan
> can merge the changes in.
>
> On similar note I talked to DJ about this also, a separate repo for
> bootscripts, with the same requirements will also need to be setup.
I've never quite understood why BLFS and LFS kept their bootscripts
separate. They could all be in one package with one Makefile that could
handle every target.
+1 on the shared repos for udev and bootscripts. Could be similar to
how patches is now.
--
Dan
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
