steve crosby wrote:
On 5/1/06, Bryan Kadzban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip>
a setup. The sticking point would be programs that include linux/<x>.h
or asm/<x>.h, if there are any. And it sounds like there are glibc
alternatives to all of those headers anyway, so it would be the program
that's broken. (Unless it's Linux-specific.)
iptables is one such application - currently non functional with jim's
script created headers, but have yet to identify why.
--
-- -
Steve Crosby
Once again a totally pointless discussion about iptables and specific
headers,
What part of this threads topic was not clear ?
I really wanted to get consensus at some level of the direction,
problems, potential of the options presented to the LFS projects, and
this has turned into a debate on iptables header usage, after I
excpilitly called out not to focus on specific and if you wanted to to
start another thread
This mailing list is clearly not working, what is the point of trying to
use this list to communicate with other developers when it is pretty
clear that it is impossible to have a discussion on a topic despite
clear requests to no do certain things, people still ignore it and carry
on their own personal discussion.
Frustrated and very dissapointed.
Matt.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
