On 5/4/06, Matt Darcy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
steve crosby wrote:
> On 5/1/06, Bryan Kadzban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>> a setup. The sticking point would be programs that include linux/<x>.h
>> or asm/<x>.h, if there are any. And it sounds like there are glibc
>> alternatives to all of those headers anyway, so it would be the program
>> that's broken. (Unless it's Linux-specific.)
>>
>
> iptables is one such application - currently non functional with jim's
> script created headers, but have yet to identify why.
>
> --
> -- -
> Steve Crosby
Once again a totally pointless discussion about iptables and specific
headers,
What part of this threads topic was not clear ?
<snip>
My intent was to identify that one of the options provided in the
thread (Jim's work with the linux headers) has problems, as it's
currently not working with certain applications outside of LFS.
Perhaps I should have been more clear in the comment I made.
I'll leave the discussion about the use\utility of discussions in
mailing lists well alone in the interests of world peace.
--
-- -
Steve Crosby
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page