Jim Gifford wrote:
Updated version with the links and why I did things is up. The only thing that has been questionable and I'm still trying to research is the __iomem removal.
__iomem removal is not questionable at all. This macro indicates that this is not a valid pointer that you can dereference directly, but a cookie that you can pass to the ioremap() in-kernel function in order to access the hardware via the MMIO mechanism. This is always defined to the empty value and used only by checkers like Coverity.
-- Alexander E. Patrakov -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
