Chris Staub wrote:
Dan Nicholson wrote:
On 3/3/06, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nah, probably not for the book. In general, I don't mind adding stuff
to /tools. After getting bent over by gcc and glibc for multiple
hours, I don't see the harm in tossing one more tiny package on the
heap. But, in this case, I think a note should suffice.
Autoconf itself certainly is just a tiny package, but it also requires
several additional Perl modules that are not currently not built there.
Of course, by "there" I mean "in /tools".
I'll try to quantify how much missing the different packages affects
the test coverage. Unless Chris has done this already.
No, I've just been looking at dependencies...haven't actually kept track
very much of exactly *what* each dependency affects.
--
Dan
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
