On 3/3/06, Chris Staub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Autoconf itself certainly is just a tiny package, but it also requires > > several additional Perl modules that are not currently not built there. > > Of course, by "there" I mean "in /tools".
Ah, good. I forgot about that. Thanks, Chris. > >> I'll try to quantify how much missing the different packages affects > >> the test coverage. Unless Chris has done this already. > > No, I've just been looking at dependencies...haven't actually kept track > very much of exactly *what* each dependency affects. I'm doing this now. Will report back. Do you remember if the libtool test suite uses the other autotools as autconf's does? Because that would kind of invalidate moving libtool up if it traded off less test coverage for that package. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
