Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 01/29/06 19:13 CST: > Ryan did that already.
Could you point me to that post where Ryan refuted some of Greg's points? I saw a post where Ryan described why a particular method was good, but from the best I could tell, didn't address any of Greg's points why a method was bad. I am not starting an argument, and will not post again. After all, I promised you. :-) I was just hoping that there could be a good discussion. And when someone (especially one of Greg's stature in the toolchain foodchain ladder) says something is bad, and gives what sounds like good reasons (I am not qualified to agree or refute them) for his assertions, and they go unanswered, I feel those assertions are simply being dismissed. > I *have* waited for three days on this. We've gotten nowhere. To me, and just an opinion from one guy, three days is not long enough, especially when the guy making the decision is self-admittedly not as technically strong as he should be. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 19:17:01 up 127 days, 4:41, 3 users, load average: 1.11, 1.03, 0.76 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
