Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 01/29/06 18:47 CST:

> Right. And, again, we're familiar with the spec. We have used it; *are*
> using it in stable and cross-lfs. Our tests and experience are based on
> it. To introduce a new method now would also mean we're introducing a
> whole new thing to test.
> 
> So. Exepect a commit in ~ 5 minutes.

Should we not wait until there is *some* sort of explanation by
somebody about Greg's points? Jeremy, since you've taken it upon
yourself to take lead in this, could you address some of Greg's
points, please?

Are we in some sort of hurry to make commits? Especially to something
as critical as toolchain packages.

-- 
Randy

rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686]
18:50:01 up 127 days, 4:14, 3 users, load average: 0.62, 0.21, 0.18
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to