On 1/25/06, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Greg Schafer wrote: > > Temporary wrapper scripts? Hmmm, these are interesting changes to say the > > least. They look completely bogus. You actually tested this stuff before > > committing? Where is the enhanced sanity check needed to verify this > > crucial stage of the build method? > > Why do you say this looks completely bogus? It's the same principle that > you have when using the CC variable on gcc.
Jeremy, Why is there no discussion going on about this? I've looked all over, and I can't find any analysis by you that suggests that these fixes are appropriate. I even went looking through the (not documented anywhere on the LFS site) IRC logs: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~ircd/logs/ I really hope this isn't happening in IRC. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
