Dan Nicholson wrote: > How is the adjusted binutils being found? Is an adjusted binutils > being installed? If you're doing the DIY static ld to > /tools/bin/ld-new with symlink /usr/bin/ld -> /tools/bin/ld-new, then > it will not be used unless you have -B/usr/bin/.
Indeed. So the current setup stays until we have a better solution. What about this? 1) Don't build a new ld in chapter 5 binutils-pass2 2) Use the startfile_prefix_spec sed 3) For binutils chapter 6 (which comes right after the adjusted toolchain), build it with: 'LDFLAGS="-L/lib -L/usr/lib" ../binutils-build/configure' and build/install it. This will add a binutils that is linked using the old linker but against the new Glibc. 4) When it's GCC's turn to build, it links using the new linker and against the new Glibc If this doesn't work, there's another idea, but I'm going to test this first. -- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
