On 1/10/06, Archaic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 1. The HTML as it stands is basically static. > 2. The people who are allowed to edit the pages already have the > ability. > 3. The website is stable and works well. > 4. The website includes some already scripted and automated dynamic > content. > 5. Making the main site a wiki requires that we can no longer mirror the > website. > > Now please explain why option 1 is better. For those who may have > forgotten the OP, option one is to use trac for the main site, viewCVS, > and bugzilla. Option 2 is to use trac for viewCVS and bugzilla and leave > the main site's infrastructure in place. >
I already stated my opinion in this thread, and I'm not an editor, but I'd like to second everything Archaic just said. There doesn't seem to be any good reason to convert the main website to trac. Or any reason why keeping the website as is would be incompatible with using trac for dynamic content. Let's not just make changes because we can. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
