Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 01/10/06 16:05 CST: > So the weight has definitely shifted to number 2. Which is what I > expected, and is fine. Unless there are any other objections then, I > think we can safely say that we will be replacing Bugzilla and ViewCVS > with a trac installation and leaving the static website in place.
Before things are changed permanently, is there any way you could summarize what exactly will change, and how it benefits us? I didn't realize that this was something that was being consider for change *right now*. I thought this was just a "first look" evaluation of Trac. I remember when LFS converted the logging program not too long ago, then had to switch back to syslog for whatever reason. I remember everyone was excited for a change, but then look what happened. I suppose I'm just not a big fan of changes, so I was hoping you could summarize this. That way everyone could review it, and go use it and know what to look for difference-wise. There's only been about 6 people vote on this, I wouldn't really call it a 'community decision' at this point. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 16:08:00 up 108 days, 1:32, 3 users, load average: 1.00, 0.82, 0.45 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
