Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 01/10/06 08:11 CST: > I have no idea how that would be feasible, but I agree. I'd like to > know what BLFS packages use BDB, especially since it's still included > in the BLFS book. Some policy would have to be made to prevent > packages like coreutils and gawk that would show up everywhere. Just > a thought. I guess BDB is the main one that bugs me.
Chances are that if you see GDBM listed as an optional dependency, then that package uses DB. I know it isn't really telling, but it's the best we have right now. I just don't know how we would even list the dependencies (such as BDB), especially if they were just optional. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 08:15:00 up 107 days, 17:39, 3 users, load average: 1.10, 1.03, 0.67 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
