On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:40:35 +0000 Richard A Downing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:25:45 -0600 > Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Richard A Downing wrote these words on 01/10/06 03:26 CST: > Perhaps I'm in a minority, but I would really quite like to see > dependencies on non-toolchain lfs packages in the BLFS. I realise > it's too much work, but it would be useful. > > On the other hand, dependencies are such a complicated issue for > taxonomical reasons: required for build, required to run, recommended > to be installed before build, ditto for running, adds functionality, > provides an alternative to, etc.,etc.. > > We should perhaps not open this box. > > R. > I should emphasise that last paragraph again, I guess. And the first clause of the last sentence of the first paragraph. I'd quite like someone to give me a billion bucks too... Even given the exchange rate. R. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
