Chris Staub wrote these words on 01/12/06 21:58 CST: > On the other hand, adding dependency info about LFS packages to BLFS now > would make things somewhat easier when an LFS package is removed or > replaced.
I don't think you've understood the point of the discussion, Chris. It is simply not something we can do. Whether you think it would be nice, or if it makes it easier to do it now instead of later, or whatever, it is simply something we cannot do. As has been said by everyone in the discussion except for you, it is a task too monumental to attempt. The advantage gained-expected return-work involved ratio is way too skewed. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 22:00:00 up 110 days, 7:24, 3 users, load average: 0.15, 0.05, 0.04 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
