On 1/10/06, Richard A Downing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:25:45 -0600 > Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Well, actually, they have been commented out. It would be really > > easy to > > > > grep -lr 'linkend="db"/>' * > > > > from the root of the XML tree and see every file that was touched. :-) > > > > Perhaps I'm in a minority, but I would really quite like to see > dependencies on non-toolchain lfs packages in the BLFS. I realise it's > too much work, but it would be useful. >
I have no idea how that would be feasible, but I agree. I'd like to know what BLFS packages use BDB, especially since it's still included in the BLFS book. Some policy would have to be made to prevent packages like coreutils and gawk that would show up everywhere. Just a thought. I guess BDB is the main one that bugs me. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
