Randy McMurchy wrote:
Thanks to you and Alex for your continued patience with me on this,
and for your answers so far. Now, with all due respect to Jim's work,
why would LFS consider doing a bunch of patching and such when it is
just a guess if this is what is going to be coming down the pipe in
just a couple of weeks with these new versions you mention?
What information can I read, or how can I learn, so that I can be
assured that what Jim is doing is the same direction that the
kernel and udev devs are going to do?
Look, I don't doubt anything anybody is saying. I'd just like to
get a handle on it myself, and I quite frankly don't have the time
to read the kernel and udev mailing lists.
There is no discussion about this stuff in the LFS lists, not even
the CLFS list, where I guess this stuff is being developed. All of
a sudden there's a message that says "but I got it to work on a
Sparc so it should work for everyone. Any changes or comments are
welcomed, but I figured I would share the news."
What news is Jim talking about? Is this news from upstream, from him,
from folks he's working with?
I talked about this packages so many times on the lists, why don't you
just pay attention, because you have commented on this in the past.
http://archives.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/lfs-dev/2005-November/054500.html
http://archives.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/cross-lfs/2005-November/000038.html
http://archives.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/cross-lfs/2005-November/000435.html
http://archives.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/cross-lfs/2005-November/000457.html
http://svn.linuxfromscratch.org/viewcvs.cgi/trunk/BOOK/TODO?root=cross-lfs&view=markup
--
------
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LFS User # 2577
Registered Linux User # 299986
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
