On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:35:50 -0600 Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Furthermore, if you start thinking about packages to pull from LFS, > then you need to start looking at Perl as well. Where do you stop? >
True. However Perl used to be needed for GCC tests to run (IIRC). We DO need to test GCC! I'd like to see syslog removed to BLFS. It's only one of a large selection of possible system loggers, and IMO not even near the best, it's just the one many distro's use. I never build it for my production systems. (although I should add that it is sweat to just not build it) I also don't build sysvinit, but I do agree that LFS needs that (to boot). :-) R. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
