Dan Nicholson wrote:
On 11/24/05, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So. I had been thinking it would be nice if LFS and BLFS adopted (some
of) this approach. Again, I fully recognize that this is new ground in a
way and that many people will think, "it is a hint and should stay a
hint", but, IMHO, there are many techniques employed here that a default
LFS user could learn from and benefit by.
As Matt has already said, LFS creates a base usable linux system with
the minimum tool set to boot. A base system.
I don't see a packagement tool - and certainly not the suggest tool as a
bare minimum or as a good base for an update.
LFS works as it is, it calls out at the start of the book what it will
build, I don't see a need to move this to include more tools like a
propritary package managment system.
Matt
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
