DJ Lucas wrote these words on 11/24/05 21:28 CST: > Well, I'd personally like to know how our current build order took > shape! Unfortunately, the answer to this question lies scattered deep > within _years_ of LFS archives, and I'm not sure that there is any > written rational behind it elsewhere.
Then start reading. The information is there if you *really* would "like to know". I snipped the rest of DJ's good post to just add some comments. It is my opinion that we have a product that works. To change the product, with unknown (at this point, still) results, with a guarantee that the product can be no better than the existing product is not a wise move. Keep in mind; all these changes may, or may not bring about undesirable results. What we do know, though, is that it won't make anything any better. At best it is what we have now. Why make changes to something that works, that doesn't result in something better? -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 21:38:00 up 61 days, 7:02, 3 users, load average: 0.19, 0.24, 0.40 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
