Jim Gifford wrote these words on 05/23/05 22:51 CST: > What is the package isn't need for either BLFS or LFS, that's the > question. I understand your concerns, but if it's only required for 2 > packages in BLFS, then is it worth being in LFS?
But Jim, your estimates are unreasonable. By my count, and on my current build, I've not built much of BLFS, there's 15 packages that look for the flex program. I've installed another 15 non-BLFS packages that look for it. Those non-BLFS packages are dependencies of BLFS packages. That's 30 packages right there, Jim. And I've only installed a portion of BLFS. -- Randy rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.4] [Linux 2.6.10 i686] 23:26:00 up 51 days, 22:59, 2 users, load average: 0.09, 0.03, 0.01 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
