Jim Gifford wrote:
Please list your comments as a go or no go.
No go, Jim. http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/lex.html suggests that it's a reasonable expectation for 'lex' to be installed on a Unix system, hence that's what we'll do. It's not in the LSB, nor in the FHS, so it depends on how many standards we want to try and stick to. Like others have said, LFS doesn't try to be minimal, if it did we could quite easily get rid of the likes of the autotools, gettext (who needs i18n anyway!) and perl.
Regards, Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
