Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
There are more developers for LFS than for BLFS, but the package count
is about 6 to 1 in favor of BLFS.
Actually, I don't think there are more for LFS atm. But your point is
still valid.
--
JH
What is the package isn't need for either BLFS or LFS, that's the
question. I understand your concerns, but if it's only required for 2
packages in BLFS, then is it worth being in LFS?
--
------
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LFS User # 2577
Registered Linux User # 299986
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
