Matthew Burgess wrote:
Exactly, so if we go and remove all those users and groups that we don't think are required/desired on a base LFS system then it'll cause pain for those then installing packages from BLFS that require those users/groups to be present. Admittedly, the pain is minimal (a 'useradd' or 'groupadd' should be all that's needed) and any LFSer worth their salt should be able to figure out what's going on, but I thought this was the agreed approach.
OK, I guess I can understand that... but we're talking only about people building LFS-SVN, and if they can't figure that part out then... :-)
I didn't stay involved in the previous discussion enough to know what the resolution was, so thanks for the reminder.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
