On 12/06/25 9:56, Edward K. Ream wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 9:07 AM Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas
<[email protected]> wrote:
> First principles should be properly located, for example in places
like geometric axioms and not in Joe/Jane Doe is un-criticable, as
(s)he is who (s)he is.
Turing proposed his test 75 years ago.
That doesn't make it automatically valid nor invalid. Newton proposed
his Principia Mathematica several centuries ago. It was the quality of
the proposal, not its author or newness/oldness, what make it stand the
test of time.
The blog is crap.
Do you mean the podcast episode? If yes, could you point to particular
places that make it so? The podcast did a pretty good work to pointing
to particular places where Turing's paper is "crap".
Offray
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/45a220f0-067c-4e03-9eac-97438763de17%40riseup.net.
