Hasn't done ferguson any harm [email protected] Subject: Re: [LU] Wise, Bates etc.
I was under the impression Kelly is a piss-head. Hardly top management material. Si. >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 11 May 2007 16:44 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected] >Subject: Re: [LU] Wise, Bates etc. > > > >What makes you think he can't? > >Fair question, though, so I'll answer it. He fits the profile >of the sort >of player who makes a good manager: not the most naturally >talented player, >but one who managed to find his way in the game and carve out >a reasonably >successful career nonetheless. Players who fit that profile >have often done so >because they have been able to figure out what it takes to >play the game >efficiently. The ones who do so and can communicate that to >others are the ones >who become excellent -- not merely good -- coaches. > >I also believe that what we need -- along with getting rid of >Master Bates >and the tragically mis-named Wise -- is someone who is Leeds >through and >through and can inspire that same in the younger players upon >whom we will have to >depend. I think that Kells can do that. > >Michael Gardiner >San Diego Whites > >In a message dated 5/11/2007 1:21:54 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >Oh... my.... god.... > >That just about sums it up. Kelly. And what on earth makes >you think that >Kelly could manage a paper round, never mind a football club? > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 10 May 2007 17:18 >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [LU] Wise, Bates etc. > > >In a message dated 5/10/2007 1:57:23 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > >Not only that, but we come back to the usual question, what >are the options >for manager if not Wise? > > > >Is it really so hard to see that if someone credible were to >come in, buy >the club and infuse capital -- treat Leeds United as the >fallen giant it >is...but a fallen giant that is getting back on its >feet...there will be >plenty of >good options. > >We could start with names we all know. Would Eddie not be an > excellent >choice in the third flight? What about Kells? What about >DOL? The fact >that >we're at least two seasons (and likely more) away from the >Premiership >opens a >lot of possibilities. > >Michael Gardiner >San Diego Whites > > > > > > > >************************************** See what's free at >http://www.aol.com. >_______________________________________________ >the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list >administrators accept no liability for the personal views and >opinions of contributors. >Leedslist mailing list >[email protected] >http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist >The Leeds List - "where never is heard a discouraging word..." > _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist The Leeds List - "where never is heard a discouraging word..." _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist The Leeds List - "where never is heard a discouraging word..."
