>> Why 'cos I wouldn't have a player in my team who can't last past the first 2 overs. I think it's you mate who knows jack shit. <<
No, because after the last time you had a typical closed minded rant about Vaughan, you'd already made your mind up about him and ignored all the points other people. This time you've repeated your original rant that looked at the negative points, and focused on what you perceive as being the be all and end all what makes an important part of a cricket team. Just like in your football rants, you home in on your tunnel vision perceptions and totally fail to appreciate that there are many facets to sport. Once you've had a long winded and one sided rant about something, why not have a think about other people's reply and think for once that other people might have equally valid views? Go back and read other people's replies to your small minded post of a few weeks ago then maybe it will sink in why England continue to select Vaughan. Calling Vaughan a cunt is utterly ridiculous and disgraceful. It shows what little understanding you have of international cricket and what little respect you have for people in general. Did you actually see any of today's game, btw? He was incredibly unlucky to get out like that. _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist it's a God awful small affair
