> Well Rich football is about opinions and I know our > views differ on Kelly. > As you say, you are the last one to preach to me > about having it in for any > of the players. I actually made the point I think > Kelly is a decent bloke > whereas your rants have been much more personal and > offensive about players > like Gregan, Butler, Douglas etc.
Agreed - but nowt wrong with getting personal especially when it's with wasters like Gregan. Should never have been associated with our great club. > > I don't know where to start responding really. You > have made a lot of > subjective comments (over 500 games and mostly > played well) the one fact is > he got Player of the Year and got in the > Championship 11. Pretty big fact though Phill. A lot of the supporters clubs gave him our player of the year as well as papers such as the YEP. Are they all wrong Phill ? I'm not trying to change your opinion but I think maybe you've got this one wrong. I know that but it > doesnt change my views. He wasnt our player of the > year last year BUT Phill he was - thousands of Leeds fans thought he was including me. but who am > I to disagree with Leeds fans who also voted for > Brian Deane (twice). Looks like you're clutching at straws now. If you watched all the teams > in the division last year > you would have picked several right backs that were > far superior to Kelly. > If you didnt see any better than him you either > werent watching or you have > never played the game. Nah. Kelly was the most consistent right back in the championship. > > Of course you have contradicted yourself by saying > at the outset that I am > always slagging Kelly then observing wrongly that I > kept quiet during his > "best perfomances" last year. I have continually > criticised him, I remember > a long rant at his first half-perfomance at > Leicester away last year which > was the worst by any player I have seen for many > years. Just about his one bad performance. I think he's allowed one of them isn't he ? The point I was making is that you only voiced your opinion on Kelly once or twice last season cos that was the number of bad games he had. You never acknowledged all the man of the match performances he has turned in. Even this year you have been quiet. Did you go to Brum at home where he was immense and what about Southend when he went off - did you notice the difference. By the way if you go to the LUFC supporters club site you can see who is leading the player of the year award this season - yep you guessed it , it's Gary Kelly. Even I have admitted that Gregan has had a few good games for the club. I say it as it is Phill. I think you're blinkered when it comes to Kelly. Has he shagged your daughter or someatt ? For £28k a week, now ..... Blah , Blah , BLah - 28k a week. Irrelevant point. Is it is wage that blinkers your judgement ? > He cant head, he > cant tackle, he cant > read the game and has very little skill. He has > relied on his speed to bale > him out and as you say he lost that yonks ago. Thats > when I gave up on him. He's a much better tackler than Richardson - that's a fact. He also very rarely gets beaten. > > The bottom line whether you are prepared to accept > it or not is if this > bloke was any good he would have been snapped up > elsewhere long ago. We have > sold every playing assett we have had but not him. > For f*ck sake, Leeds > allegedly wanted rid so bad they were going to pay > some hoods to break his > legs and claim the insurance! Oh Phill come on. Does this mean he's shit. This argument is about whether Kelly can play or not. You're argument that someone connected to Leeds wanted to do him in to get the insurance has no relevance at all and if that's the best you can do in justifying why you think Kelly is 'crap' I'd keep quiet. > > Wise obviously feels the same as me because the > little fella is going to > f*ck off Kelly. Who is waiting to sign him, ok not > Prem teams but can the > bestr right back in the Championship get a contract > with another > Chanmpionship team? No he is going to play in the > paddy league for Drogheda > (sic?). I rest my case. Again Wise's decision is purely financial and that I can understand. If this is your argument then I agree with it. We can't afford to be playing players in this division who are earning 28k a week BUT in Kelly's case , nobody in the championship can afford his wasges so I'm happy to see him stay and keep us up. By the way, you might have to eat your words here because the news is that Kelly is ready to return to Wise's plans. What would you think to that then Phill ? > > Phill > :-) > Marching on Together (without Kelly) > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get Hotmail, News, Sport and Entertainment from MSN > on your mobile. > http://www.msn.txt4content.com/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and > the list administrators accept no liability for the > personal views and opinions of contributors. > Leedslist mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > 'I am in shock,' said Ferguson. ___________________________________________________________ Web email has come of age. Don't settle for less than the All New Yahoo! Mail http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist 'I am in shock,' said Ferguson.
