No, it isn't a no-brainer.
We'd have had absolutely no money at all if we'd been promoted - about half
the Sky money would have gone on paying ex-players etc. We'd have been unable to
attract premiership-quality players given the budgets available.
You're suggesting it would be better to go up for one season, get
absolutely pasted, get relegated and try to rebuild again. How does that make
any sense? Better to get promoted and be in a position to stay up, surely? Then
you don't need to worry about parachute payments...
Do you really think that's the case? After seven games of a 46-game season?
The steady course over the plast two seasons has been steady improvement. Not
spectacular, but smoother than could have been expected, and a few blips along
the way are inevitable. What did you expect? Working for Clifford Chance surely
gives you some insight into just how bad the financial position has been - and
remains until the last of the Ridsdale contracts are paid off in June 07?
Mark
|
- RE: [LU] A low point David . Woolmer
- RE: [LU] A low point Steve Gillen
- Re: [LU] A low point MarkBursa
- Re: [LU] A low point MarkBursa
- Re: [LU] A low point Jim Moran
- RE: [LU] A low point Richard Naef
- Re: [LU] A low point Richard Walker
- Re: [LU] A low point Paul Dally
- RE: [LU] A low point David . Woolmer
- Re: [LU] A low point MarkBursa
- RE: [LU] A low point David . Woolmer

