almost impossible? Its hard, I ll grant you that. some are better
motivators than others. a manager like mourinho must be good at it
getting the results hes had with his guys. you couldnt get what he got
if he wasnt good at installing motivation, thats for sure. on top of
them CFC motivated hes managed to avoid the trap of getting his
players full of themselves, they ve been performing week in and week
out.

my point being, its totally possible, and far away from close to impossible.

Now, IF a manager hasnt got his players trust then its impossible. is
that what we re seeing here

rick w. I layed it all out for you there, go get it! :-)

Eric

On 8/25/06, Mark Humphries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:




Its almost impossible for a manage to instil confidence in a team of players
– if they could do that then they would be worth their weight in gold.



Our lack of performance at home is nothing to do with motivation in my
opinion.  It's a lack of confidence which means players aren't brave enough
to take chances – in fear of fucking up and having the crowd on their backs.



As for training, that's always a delicate balance – don't push players hard
enough in training and their fitness wains towards the end of the first few
league matches.  Push them too hard and you get preseason injuries.



Clearly there was something lacking in our match conditioning – quite
possibly the lack of preseason friendlies, and you should know the number
and location of preseason friendlies isn't all down to the manager.  I
suspect Blackwell would have wanted more preseason friendlies so he could
get all his squad match fit.



Anyhow, it could be worse – look at sunderland.



 ________________________________


From: eric barlier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 25 August 2006 15:53
 To: Mark Humphries
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[email protected]
 Subject: Re: [LU] bits 'n' bobs



its a managers job to make sure his players are motivated and performing at
home and away. thats life.


as for injuries: i dont know what injuries they are nor how and what
training methods LUFC use, but if


training is shit the players will be prone to injuries, and ultimately this
is also the managers responsibility.





my 1487262 pennies worth.






On Aug 25, 2006, at 3:22 PM, Mark Humphries wrote:






He is picking the same players home and away so how does that mean its his
fault they freeze at home but do ok away?




He has also bemoaned the size of his squad, and we have a fair few injuries
and suspensions floating about at the moment – again, I cant see how that's
his fault?




And shipping goals late on is probably due to conditioning, or lack thereof
– something you could say is the fault of the management (specifically the
fitness coaches), but hardly a terminal fault is it.. and by its very
definition likely to improve considerably as the season starts.  Sticking my
neck out here, I would say we are much less likely to concede those late
goals now.




 ________________________________


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 25 August 2006 15:05
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[email protected]
 Subject: Re: [LU] bits 'n' bobs






In a message dated 8/25/2006 9:35:33 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


The performances haven't been great at home either, but my point is that
 this is more down to the players than to any deficiency in our management
or
 coaching.

 Like to pick a hole in that?


Sure, the players are the ones selected by the manager. He's been bleating
for the last two seasons that he didn't have "his" team. Now he does. And
they're shipping late goals like nobody's business. The buck has to
ultimately stop with the manager.






Cheers!






Sean







_______________________________________________
the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators 
accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors.
Leedslist mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
oh alright then :-)

Reply via email to