Bloody good rant John, and the vast majority of it spot on. When we were playing three up front (with the game just about already over), we actually looked as though we could play a bit! I thought the game was lost with the team selection, but the ref gave us f**k all, we had no luck at all, while they had bucket loads. Having said that , the best team on the day still won.
Now is the ideal time for Blackwell to go (taken us as far as he can, blah blah blah.....) and for us to get ourselves a proven Premiership manager - Curbishley wont be unemployed for long!!! Rogerre Roger M Goodair Telecoms & ICT Support Manager University of Bradford Richmond Road BRADFORD BD7 1DP --__--__-- Message: 5 Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 13:00:36 +0100 (BST) From: John Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: LU List <[email protected]> Subject: [LU] Time for change - Blackwell Out NOW!! --0-995843777-1148299236=:42337 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Blackwell - looks like a Wally Arnolds coach driver in his Sunday best! What we have is a manager who 'plays safe' to the point of perversity, meaning that aside from an individual 'special', a set-play or f*** knows what we're about as creative as a house-brick! The tactics yesterday were, unfortunately, typical of other displays I've seen (and I have complained about them non-stop!). Invite teams onto the 8/9 men behind the ball, try and tire them out for 60 minutes, then open up - slightly! Absolutely f***ing terrible to watch and, crucially, ineffective against teams who have any midfielders, because the ball just comes straight back. Of course that might not be such a problem if we have 4 Kilgallons, but in Butler and Gregan we have dollops of the highest order. How can Gregan strut around with such arrogance given that 75% of his clearances are sliced (can't get to the ball quick enough), whilst the rest go straight back to the opposition. Butler, even given his 'experience', is simply yesterdays man. That said, I don't blame them alone - this team is Blackwell's, and if I was Bates watching that yesterday I'd have him out to Monaco before the days up and ask him what the f*** that was!! Then I'd sack him! What a wasted opportunity yesterday was, on every front. All the talk of how many attackers we've got is a diversion if we don't have a midfield. What was the icing on a p*ss poor cake was that when Leeds started to look for a goal there were one or two players who looked half capable. I repeat what I said earlier - BLACKWELL IS THE PROBLEM!! So, now for the troublesome bits. I hear that Boro are due some £1.5m plus for Ricketts at season-end - is that correct? I also hear that Reading are looking at/ have made a £2.5m bid for Killgallon? If that's correct then God help us! I thought Leeds had already lost the game in the tunnel yesterday - Watford (a very poor mans Wimbledon) were doing all their squaddie camaraderie bit whilst Leeds players were gawping around like lost kids - quite what Gary Kelly was thinking was anyone's guess! Seemed to be only one team in that tunnel, and it wasn't Leeds. Listening to Boothroyd spouting his pseudo-management Americanisms was refreshing for about 20 seconds, but at least he had a clue, which is more than Blackwell displayed. Whoever said that Blackwell went missing at the end is absolutely spot on - he's out of his depth. All the sh*te he quoted about where Leeds have come from, how few players we had blah blah blah - what about the game, the tactics required, the vision for the future. Get him out now! Even as someone very much on the sidelines of LUFC activity, the f***ing incompetence of our managerial 'team' makes me angrier than I can express. da Rev ranting Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com --0-995843777-1148299236=:42337 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit <DIV>Blackwell - looks like a Wally Arnolds coach driver in his Sunday best!</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>What we have is a manager who 'plays safe' to the point of perversity, meaning that aside from an individual 'special', a set-play or f*** knows what we're about as creative as a house-brick! The tactics yesterday were, unfortunately, typical of other displays I've seen (and I have complained about them non-stop!). Invite teams onto the 8/9 men behind the ball, try and tire them out for 60 minutes, then open up - slightly! Absolutely f***ing terrible to watch and, crucially, ineffective against teams who have any midfielders, because the ball just comes straight back. Of course that might not be such a problem if we have 4 Kilgallons, but in Butler and Gregan we have dollops of the highest order. How can Gregan strut around with such arrogance given that 75% of his clearances are sliced (can't get to the ball quick enough), whilst the rest go straight back to the opposition. Butler, even given his 'experience', is simply yesterdays man. That said, I don't blame them alone - this team is Blackwell's, and if I was Bates watching that yesterday I'd have him out to Monaco before the days up and ask him what the f*** that was!! Then I'd sack him!</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>What a wasted opportunity yesterday was, on every front. All the talk of how many attackers we've got is a diversion if we don't have a midfield. What was the icing on a p*ss poor cake was that when Leeds started to look for a goal there were one or two players who looked half capable. I repeat what I said earlier - BLACKWELL IS THE PROBLEM!!</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>So, now for the troublesome bits. I hear that Boro are due some £1.5m plus for Ricketts at season-end - is that correct? I also hear that Reading are looking at/ have made a £2.5m bid for Killgallon? If that's correct then God help us! </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>I thought Leeds had already lost the game in the tunnel yesterday - Watford (a very poor mans Wimbledon) were doing all their squaddie camaraderie bit whilst Leeds players were gawping around like lost kids - quite what Gary Kelly was thinking was anyone's guess! Seemed to be only one team in that tunnel, and it wasn't Leeds. Listening to Boothroyd spouting his pseudo-management Americanisms was refreshing for about 20 seconds, but at least he had a clue, which is more than Blackwell displayed. Whoever said that Blackwell went missing at the end is absolutely spot on - he's out of his depth. All the sh*te he quoted about where Leeds have come from, how few players we had blah blah blah - what about the game, the tactics required, the vision for the future. Get him out now!</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Even as someone very much on the sidelines of LUFC activity, the f***ing incompetence of our managerial 'team' makes me angrier than I can express.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>da Rev</DIV> <DIV>ranting</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> <BR></DIV><p>Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com --0-995843777-1148299236=:42337-- --__--__-- Message: 6 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 08:13:41 EDT Subject: Re: [LU] Time for change - Blackwell Out NOW!! To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [email protected] -------------------------------1148300021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 5/22/2006 8:03:53 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: thought Leeds had already lost the game in the tunnel yesterday - Watford (a very poor mans Wimbledon) were doing all their squaddie camaraderie bit whilst Leeds players were gawping around like lost kids - quite what Gary Kelly was thinking was anyone's guess! Seemed to be only one team in that tunnel, and it wasn't Leeds. I completely agree, and had exactly the same thoughts at the time. That was a huge hint, seeing Watford shouting and laughing and bantering, and our guys just looking quiet - not quiet and determined, but more like quiet and scared. Sean -------------------------------1148300021 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <HTML><HEAD> <META charset=3DUS-ASCII http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; cha= rset=3DUS-ASCII"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2873" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD> <BODY style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; BACKGROUND-COLOR: #fffff= f"> <DIV> <DIV>In a message dated 5/22/2006 8:03:53 AM Eastern Daylight Time, bruvvale= [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:</DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: blue=20= 2px solid"><FONT face=3DArial>thought Leeds had already lost the game in the= tunnel yesterday - Watford (a very poor mans Wimbledon) were doing al= l their squaddie camaraderie bit whilst Leeds players were gawping around li= ke lost kids - quite what Gary Kelly was thinking was anyone's guess! Seemed= to be only one team in that tunnel, and it wasn't Leeds. </FONT></BLOCKQUOT= E></DIV> <DIV>I completely agree, and had exactly the same thoughts at the time. = ;That was a huge hint, seeing Watford shouting and laughing and bantering, a= nd our guys just looking quiet - not quiet and determined, but more like qui= et and scared.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Sean</DIV></BODY></HTML> -------------------------------1148300021-- --__--__-- _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist End of Leedslist Digest _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
