In terms of what you need on the target netserver/netperf from ipkg is tiny and is all you need.
On 30 January 2018 at 10:51, Joel Wirāmu Pauling <j...@aenertia.net> wrote: > FLENT + RRUL testing is 4 up 4 down TCP streams with 4 different QoS > Markings, and then 4 different QoS Marked UDP probes and ICMP. > > It gives you a measure of how much the CPU and Network path can cope > with load conditions, which are more realistic for everyday use. > > iperf3 isn't going to give you any measure of that. > > On 30 January 2018 at 10:48, Karl Palsson <ka...@tweak.net.au> wrote: >> >> Joel Wirāmu Pauling <j...@aenertia.net> wrote: >>> Any chance I can convince you to use netperf + FLENT for doing >>> your tests rather than iperf(3)? >>> >>> flent.org >>> >> >> For those playing at home, could you elaborate on _why_? What do >> you expect to change? By what sort of percentage? >> >> Sincerely, >> Karl Palsson _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
