Any chance I can convince you to use netperf + FLENT for doing your tests rather than iperf(3)?
flent.org -Joel On 30 January 2018 at 03:12, Michael Richardson <m...@sandelman.ca> wrote: > > Laurent GUERBY <laur...@guerby.net> wrote: > >> So that means that you have to do the performance testing for routing > >> between two subnets. > > > Hi, > > > With wired, firewall off and using routing (no MASQUERADE, explicit LAN > > route added on the NUC via WAN IP): > > Thanks for doing this again. > This is Openwrt/LEDE, or the stock firmware? > I think Openwrt. > > > - IPv4 590+ Mbit/s up and 690+ Mbit/s down > > - IPv6 270+ Mbit/s same both ways > > > So without NAT/conntrack we gain about 50% on IPv4 and we're closer to > > line rate. > > I wonder why the asymmetry. > > > For the record I tested without the router to check iperf3 my setup and > > IPv4 and IPv6 are 910+ Mbit/s both ways. > > > Sincerely, > > > Laurent > > > PS: kernel is 4.9.77 on the archer (not 4.4, thinko in my first mail) > > NUC and laptop are running 4.9 debian stretch too. > > > -- > ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ > ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [ > ] m...@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails > [ > > > _______________________________________________ > Lede-dev mailing list > Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev > _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
