Laurent GUERBY <laur...@guerby.net> wrote:
> I tested today a few things on a brand new TP-Link Archer C7 v4.0,
> LAN client Dell Latitude 7480 (eth I219-LM, wifi 8265 / 8275)
> WAN server NUC5i3RYB (eth I218-V), NAT between them, <1 ms latency
> (everything on the same table), IPv4 unless specified,
> using iperf3 LAN=>WAN and -R for WAN=>LAN (both TCP).
> With the TP-Link firmware:
> - wired 930+ Mbit/s both ways
> - wireless 5G 560+ Mbit/s down 440+ Mbit/s up
> - wireless 2.4G 100+ Mbit/s both ways
> With OpenWRT/LEDE trunk 20180128 4.4 kernel:
> - wired 350-400 Mbit/s both ways
> - wired with firewall deactivated 550 Mbit/s
> (just "iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -j MASQUERADE")
That still means you have conn-tracking loaded.
Have you tried without that?
> - wired IPv6 routing, no NAT, no firewall 250 Mbit/s
> - wireless 5G 150-200 Mbit/s
> - wireless 2.4G forgot to test
Does the TP-Link firmware support any IPv6?
You could report 0Mb/s for IPv6 :-)
> IPv6 performance without NAT being below IPv4 with NAT seems
> to indicate there are potential gains in software :).
Depends upon whether there is hardware support for NAT,
which many devices have, wrapped up under NDAs.
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
] m...@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
