>From the OP I wanted to ask folks whether they want me to continue to cross post to these
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 2:49 AM, John Crispin <j...@phrozen.org> wrote: > > > On 16/06/2016 09:18, L. D. Pinney wrote: >> OP wants to know if it's OK to cross post about old subjects. > > no he did not, he never asked that > > >> Particularly TR-069 already available as packages for LEDE. >> > > ok you did not understand the purpose of the thread was. > > > >> Notably freecwmp and easycwmp > > yeah works great everyone is happy that is why they are looking for > alternatives > > >> NAK... use reasonable mailing list etiquette. >> > > ok, 1 nak form someone that missed the point and a pile of folks that > think its good and welcome that prpl is starting to work in public > rather than doing back room deals behind closed doors. > > </thread> > > >> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 2:17 AM, L. D. Pinney <ldpin...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> OP wants to know if it's OK to cross post about old subjects. >>> >>> Particularly TR-069 already available as packages for LEDE. >>> >>> Notably freecwmp and easycwmp >>> >>> NAK... use reasonable mailing list etiquette. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 1:11 AM, John Crispin <j...@phrozen.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> what an utterly bizarre conversation to wake up to. >>>> >>>> the list is non-subscribe/public post for a reason. i dont see why >>>> there is a need for X mailing lists. If you dont like it, then dont read >>>> it. >>>> >>>> this is a development related discussion and the rules clearly state >>>> that we would prefer companies to hold them in public. fair enough its >>>> not about actual source code yet, but it aims to get people involved in >>>> creating such code. >>>> >>>> if there is anything we should ask people not to do, then it is having >>>> these 40 email threads which divert from the original topic. >>>> >>>> this is a free community project. lets keep it free and not try to >>>> impose any rules beyond the "be nice to each other" and "be >>>> open/transparent" ones. >>>> >>>> anyone still recall what OP actually wanted ? >>>> >>>> John >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 16/06/2016 02:38, John Allen wrote: >>>>> Yes, I would like Eric to continue posting "here". However, I think we >>>>> need to define "here", I think we need a couple more lists dedicated to >>>>> Lede, a "I've got a question/Help list" and "the think tank list". >>>>> Conversation about the future direction of Lede including this >>>>> conversation about TR-069 should probably be held in the "think tank". >>>>> Whether these should be moderated or not is up to the you! >>>>> >>>>> JohnA >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 2016-06-15 6:10 PM, L. D. Pinney wrote: >>>>>> Just because a company works on something doesn't make it evil. >>>>>> Yes of course large corporations are well known for altruistic >>>>>> behavior. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 5:03 PM, David Lang <da...@lang.hm> wrote: >>>>>>> Is it really pushing a corporate agenda to coordinate efforts to make >>>>>>> LEDE/OpenWRT support remote management protocols? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Just because a company works on something doesn't make it evil. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> David Lang >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, L. D. Pinney wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 16:29:08 -0500 >>>>>>>> From: L. D. Pinney <ldpin...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> To: LEDE Development List <lede-dev@lists.infradead.org> >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Postings to the LEDE Development List should be devoted to technical >>>>>>>> development issues. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Persons from prplfoundation et.al should respect conventional mail >>>>>>>> list >>>>>>>> etiquette such as found here : >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/etiquette.php >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Pay particular attention to 4, 7, and 10 on the above etiquitte list. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I see prplfoundation as a hostile takeover of LEDE / OpenWrt by a >>>>>>>> corporate conspiracy. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Free Software is meant to be free ... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Free from the manipulation of governments and corporations. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Pushing your corporate backed agenda on the Development List(s) >>>>>>>> torques me off every time. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Eric Schultz >>>>>>>> <eschu...@prplfoundation.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>> As we continue the TR-069 support discussion, I wanted to ask folks >>>>>>>>> whether they want me to continue to cross post to these list in >>>>>>>>> addition >>>>>>>>> to the prplwrt list at open...@lists.prplfoundation.org. I have no >>>>>>>>> problem doing either way, but I don't want to fill people's inbox >>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>> stuff they feel is off topic. Just wanted to get a sense of what >>>>>>>>> people >>>>>>>>> would prefer. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Eric >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Eric Schultz, Community Manager, prpl Foundation >>>>>>>>> http://www.prplfoundation.org >>>>>>>>> eschu...@prplfoundation.org >>>>>>>>> cell: 920-539-0404 >>>>>>>>> skype: ericschultzwi >>>>>>>>> @EricPrpl >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Lede-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>> Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org >>>>>>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Lede-dev mailing list >>>>>>>> Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org >>>>>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev >>>>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Lede-dev mailing list >>>>>> Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org >>>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Lede-dev mailing list >>>>> Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org >>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev >>> >>> _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
