On 16/06/2016 09:18, L. D. Pinney wrote: > OP wants to know if it's OK to cross post about old subjects.
no he did not, he never asked that > Particularly TR-069 already available as packages for LEDE. > ok you did not understand the purpose of the thread was. > Notably freecwmp and easycwmp yeah works great everyone is happy that is why they are looking for alternatives > NAK... use reasonable mailing list etiquette. > ok, 1 nak form someone that missed the point and a pile of folks that think its good and welcome that prpl is starting to work in public rather than doing back room deals behind closed doors. </thread> > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 2:17 AM, L. D. Pinney <ldpin...@gmail.com> wrote: >> OP wants to know if it's OK to cross post about old subjects. >> >> Particularly TR-069 already available as packages for LEDE. >> >> Notably freecwmp and easycwmp >> >> NAK... use reasonable mailing list etiquette. >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 1:11 AM, John Crispin <j...@phrozen.org> wrote: >>> >>> what an utterly bizarre conversation to wake up to. >>> >>> the list is non-subscribe/public post for a reason. i dont see why >>> there is a need for X mailing lists. If you dont like it, then dont read >>> it. >>> >>> this is a development related discussion and the rules clearly state >>> that we would prefer companies to hold them in public. fair enough its >>> not about actual source code yet, but it aims to get people involved in >>> creating such code. >>> >>> if there is anything we should ask people not to do, then it is having >>> these 40 email threads which divert from the original topic. >>> >>> this is a free community project. lets keep it free and not try to >>> impose any rules beyond the "be nice to each other" and "be >>> open/transparent" ones. >>> >>> anyone still recall what OP actually wanted ? >>> >>> John >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 16/06/2016 02:38, John Allen wrote: >>>> Yes, I would like Eric to continue posting "here". However, I think we >>>> need to define "here", I think we need a couple more lists dedicated to >>>> Lede, a "I've got a question/Help list" and "the think tank list". >>>> Conversation about the future direction of Lede including this >>>> conversation about TR-069 should probably be held in the "think tank". >>>> Whether these should be moderated or not is up to the you! >>>> >>>> JohnA >>>> >>>> >>>> On 2016-06-15 6:10 PM, L. D. Pinney wrote: >>>>> Just because a company works on something doesn't make it evil. >>>>> Yes of course large corporations are well known for altruistic >>>>> behavior. >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 5:03 PM, David Lang <da...@lang.hm> wrote: >>>>>> Is it really pushing a corporate agenda to coordinate efforts to make >>>>>> LEDE/OpenWRT support remote management protocols? >>>>>> >>>>>> Just because a company works on something doesn't make it evil. >>>>>> >>>>>> David Lang >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, L. D. Pinney wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 16:29:08 -0500 >>>>>>> From: L. D. Pinney <ldpin...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> To: LEDE Development List <lede-dev@lists.infradead.org> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Postings to the LEDE Development List should be devoted to technical >>>>>>> development issues. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Persons from prplfoundation et.al should respect conventional mail >>>>>>> list >>>>>>> etiquette such as found here : >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/etiquette.php >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Pay particular attention to 4, 7, and 10 on the above etiquitte list. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I see prplfoundation as a hostile takeover of LEDE / OpenWrt by a >>>>>>> corporate conspiracy. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Free Software is meant to be free ... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Free from the manipulation of governments and corporations. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Pushing your corporate backed agenda on the Development List(s) >>>>>>> torques me off every time. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Eric Schultz >>>>>>> <eschu...@prplfoundation.org> wrote: >>>>>>>> As we continue the TR-069 support discussion, I wanted to ask folks >>>>>>>> whether they want me to continue to cross post to these list in >>>>>>>> addition >>>>>>>> to the prplwrt list at open...@lists.prplfoundation.org. I have no >>>>>>>> problem doing either way, but I don't want to fill people's inbox >>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>> stuff they feel is off topic. Just wanted to get a sense of what >>>>>>>> people >>>>>>>> would prefer. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Eric >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Eric Schultz, Community Manager, prpl Foundation >>>>>>>> http://www.prplfoundation.org >>>>>>>> eschu...@prplfoundation.org >>>>>>>> cell: 920-539-0404 >>>>>>>> skype: ericschultzwi >>>>>>>> @EricPrpl >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Lede-dev mailing list >>>>>>>> Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org >>>>>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Lede-dev mailing list >>>>>>> Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org >>>>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev >>>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Lede-dev mailing list >>>>> Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org >>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Lede-dev mailing list >>>> Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org >>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
