On 2016-05-27 01:43, Delbar Jos wrote: > Hi all, > > At Technicolor we have followed with great interest the recent > proposals to enhance OpenWrt with an open source solution for TR-069 > remote management. As one of the world's largest vendors of modems > and routers for carrier applications, making use of OpenWrt in a > significant share of our install base, we want to support this > initiative in a meaningful way. Concretely, we are willing to open > source Technicolor's in-house TR-069 solution and thereby contribute > to OpenWrt: > * a TR-069 protocol agent, > * a data model mapping framework that we use to bridge the world of > OpenWrt, UCI, UBUS ... with the world of TR-069, TR-098, TR-181 ... > (and by extension with the world of SNMP, MIB, NETCONF, YANG ...), > * a set of mappings. Nice!
> We are conscious of the fact that together with the proposals made > by Felix, Luka and Wojtek we are now looking at many "competing" proposals. > As a next step, we recommend to organize a workshop, at a practical > location and time, where we put everything on the table and define the > most appropriate path forward to the benefit of OpenWrt as a whole. I think such a workshop would be a great idea. It would be nice to have the code available for review some time before that workshop, so we can all take a detailed look at the various proposals before we sit down and decide how to move forward with this. > TR-069 is a complicated remote management system and in order to make > this initiative a success, we must ensure that the complexity is > handled in an elegant way and with respect for OpenWrt's core > architecture. More than on the protocol itself, we believe that we > should focus on the architectural enhancements required to support > remote management in general. Sounds good! - Felix _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
