On 13 October 2010 19:26, Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > > actually, I think in dwarf 3 the lower bound can be defined (and from a > search in fpc sources, it may even be done...); but I couldn't get dwarf 3 > results to work at all...
Probably the wrong list to ask, but what is the state of dwarf3 support in FPC? From the many dwarf articles I have read tonight, it seems dwarf 3 final spec was released back in January 2006, so I would imagine any new debugger improvements must use dwarf 3 instead of dwarf 2? But as for as I know the default dwarf format used by FPC is dwarf 2... why is that? From what I have read dwarf2 was just such a big mess as Coff - little documentation, various incompatible implementations etc... All this and more was what dwarf 3 aimed to resolve. Correct? -- Regards, - Graeme - _______________________________________________ fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit http://opensoft.homeip.net:8080/fpgui/ -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
