The KR is certainly an efficient airframe with an efficient airfoil.  If I run 
the same efficienty calc as Larry ran, using my Continental A75 turning 2450 
RPM (redline is 2600) turning my 72x36 Culver prop, theoretical 100% efficiency 
would move the airplane through the air at 167 MPH.  I'm just a little off that 
pace though.  I cruise at a comfortable 70 or so, which means the prop is only 
42% efficient in pulling the plane through the air.  The rest of its work is 
spent beating the air into submission while dragging a strut-braced, 
wire-braced, open-cockpit wood-and-fabric 1929 design through the air and 
burning about 4 gallons of avgas per hour to do it.  Most any KR is at least 
twice as efficient.

Oscar Zuniga
Medford, OR
Air Camper NX41CC
________________________________
-Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
-Change list delivery options at 
https://list.krnet.org/list/krnet.list.krnet.org/ Affinity List Info Board
-Search recent KRnet Archives at  
https://list.krnet.org/empathy/list/krnet.list.krnet.org/
-Search John Bouyea's decades of archive at 
https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/ 

Reply via email to