13.5G?! Incredible! I actually worried about the integrity of the KR wings,
especially considering the detachable wing design, where both wings are
connected via 8 bolts on each side, and only 4 bolts looked strong enough
in my eyes....

Actually, I see that the Sonex has a much better wing design, because it is
easily foldable, and doesn't really need to tie any bolts & nots each time
when you pull it out of your hangar!

I will be interested to know why Ken Rand didn't consider the Sonex type of
foldable wing design, and is there anyone in this group who might have
already converted his/her KR2 into a foldable wing structure like the Sonex
has?

Kindly,

Dr. Hsu


On Fri, Apr 3, 2020, 10:57 PM shafferj455js--- via KRnet <
krnet@list.krnet.org> wrote:

> Years ago, a California builder, Tested a stock KR-2 Center section
> spar to destruction. It was good for 13.5 G's.
>
>         -----------------------------------------From: "Mark Langford via
> KRnet"
> To: "Dr. Feng Hsu via KRnet"
> Cc: "Mark Langford"
> Sent: Friday April 3 2020 7:10:31PM
> Subject: Re: KR> BRS chute
>
> Dr. Hsu wrote:
>
>  > Has anyone heard any in-flight structure failures at all on KRs?
>
>  This question has come up many times on the list, and to my
> knowledge,
>  there's never been a structural failure (spars, fuselage....anything
>  made of wood) on a KR. There was a KR look-alike that lost its wings
>  during a high speed flyby at a KR Gathering, but it was composite,
> built
>  in a short time frame, and apparently not as strong as a
> "plans-built"
>  KR. Another "may" have had an elevator horn break (or the crash may
>  have caused it), but that's the only one that I know of, and I
> wouldn't
>  call that structural, and it was isolated, if it even happened.
>
>  Mark Langford
>  m...@n56ml.com
>  http://www.n56ml.com [1]
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Search the KRnet Archives at  see
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1] http://www.n56ml.com
> [2] https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
> https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
>  /> Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at </br<></a><a href=
> [3] http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Search the KRnet Archives at
> https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
> Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change
> options.
> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org
>
_______________________________________________
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org

Reply via email to