Dave,

Currently the regulations say that if the purpose is to operate an 
amateur-built aircraft, then the experimental certificate is issued to the 
original builder, the person(s) who did the major portion of the work 
(interpreted to be 51%).   See FAR 21.191(g):

Experimental certificates are issued for the following purposes:
(a) Research and development. Testing new aircraft design concepts, new 
aircraft equipment, new aircraft installations, new aircraft operating 
techniques, or new uses for aircraft.
(b) Showing compliance with regulations. Conducting flight tests and other 
operations to show compliance with the airworthiness regulations including 
flights to show compliance for issuance of type and supplemental type 
certificates, flights to substantiate major design changes, and flights to show 
compliance with the function and reliability requirements of the regulations.
(c) Crew training. Training of the applicant's flight crews.
(d) Exhibition. Exhibiting the aircraft's flight capabilities, performance, or 
unusual characteristics at air shows, motion picture, television, and similar 
productions, and the maintenance of exhibition flight proficiency, including 
(for persons exhibiting aircraft) flying to and from such air shows and 
productions.
(e) Air racing. Participating in air races, including (for such participants) 
practicing for such air races and flying to and from racing events.
(f) Market surveys. Use of aircraft for purposes of conducting market surveys, 
sales demonstrations, and customer crew training only as provided in Sec. 
21.195.
(g) Operating amateur-built aircraft. Operating an aircraft the major portion 
of which has been fabricated and assembled by persons who undertook the 
construction project solely for their own education or recreation.

Ed Janssen





On 08/14/2009 07:30 AM, paley anderson wrote:
>     That  
> being said , what are the chances of it aquiring it's certification  
> by me ( a non- building owner ) ? Will I be wasting time and money ?
>          Dave Anderson
>   

Reply via email to