Hi Randy, If you're making decisions based on the note I wrote, you might want to listen to what these guys are saying. I'm just throwing ideas out there, trying to get information. Changing the length significantly has its ramifications; one being the plane may be very difficult to balance if not impossible. Whatever I decide to do, I take on the responsibility of, it might not work. I'm just gambling on leg room because I have to. I've grown up with clothes that don't fit, cars that don't fit, and now planes that don't fit. Being tall has it's short commings. I'll probably go with the 2", but it might not work. I'm still trying to decide on what to do with the back of the fuselage. Russ Kendall ----- Original Message ----- From: "RANDY POWELL" <randywpow...@verizon.net> To: "KRnet" <kr...@mylist.net> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 7:30 PM Subject: KR> Fuselage length
> Having read through the archives researching the fuselage length for a KR2S it would seem that the consensus is to add two inches in front of the front spar and 14 inches behind the rear spar. Is this still the generally agreed way to go?. Also if lengthening the fuselage in this fashion is the trend to go with the new wider elevator and new airfoil or stick to the stock elevator width and use the new foil ?. > _______________________________________ > Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp > to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net > Post photos, introductions, and For Sale items to http://www.kr2forum.com/phpBB2/index.php > please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
