I don't think it is a lot of grief, thats all I did for thirty years is redesign aircraft to make them fly at transonic speeds or increase the drag rise Mach number from speeds like 0.82 to as high as 0.98. The KR-1B is a good idea, but single place and the Sonex has all those rivit head turbulators sticking out all over it. There is really nothing out there as neet as a KR-2S but it just does not have enough wing area and wing span to get the stall speed down and the climb rate up. Jim
On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 18:32:16 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time) "Dan Heath" <da...@alltel.net> writes: > Why not build a Sonex or some other recognized ELSA compliant > aircraft and > save yourself a lot of grief? > > See N64KR at http://KRBuilder.org - Then click on the pics > > See you in Mt. Vernon - 2006 - KR Gathering > > There is a time for building and a time for FLYING and the time for > building > is OVER. > > Daniel R. Heath - Lexington, SC > > -------Original Message------- > > Why not just build a KR-1B? > > > _______________________________________ > Search the KRnet Archives at > http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp > to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net > please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html > >
