I understand the physical (chemical) differences between Styrofoam
(polystyrene?) and Polyurethane.

I have used Styrofoam in various densities from 2 to 6 lb/cub ft - the
higher density stuff appears to be mechanically as strong (or stronger)
than PolyU when used as a composite core material - is this correct?

This may be a naïve question as I have not seen (touched) the stuff you
call Lastofoam (Divinicel?).  Maybe this is a mechanically stronger
polyU, but the stuff locally available is very fragile - I can poke my
finger all the way into it without much effort and the surface readily
crumbles almost to a dust when rubbed - not an ideal surface to glue
anything to.  My wife uses it for flower arrangements.  

Styrofoam has its own draw backs in that Vinyl Ester resins (and most
solvents /avgas) will attack it. 

I need to appreciate the structural qualities /suitability for use in
the KR type construction.  In a perfect world (and the US) a large
variety of core materials can be purchased without any trouble - in
fact, someone will deliver whatever you desire to your front door.

This is not the case for me in Africa.  I can however source good
quality (not re-cycled) white Styrofoam in many densities from South
Africa.  The stuff is easy to "slice" into sheets of any thickness with
a hot wire.  It does not sand as well as polyU, but the higher density
stuff is not too bad - it can be done.

I am looking to do Mark L style sandwich wing skins - glass on both
sides of the skin core.  The logistics of shaping the material aside -
can Styrofoam be used to the same good effect?  The theory says that the
strength of a composite sandwich increases almost exponentially with
thickness.

I cannot see that polyU will outperform Styrofoam in compressive or
tensile strength - maybe the shear capability is the issue?

I will appreciate any informed advice

Regards
Steve J



Reply via email to