This is where an "angle of attack" meter saves the day, since the plane
will stall at the same angle of attack no matter what the flight
conditions.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

Larry F has referenced a brilliant source of definitions (and a whole
lot more) - well worth a read.

Over years I have tried to express AofA in the simplest (least
confusing) manner - it is an important term in the life of an aviator.

In the simplest of terms - A of A is the angular diff between where the
airplane is pointing and where it is going - think about it.

Then think about the deck angle during a power off stall vs. the deck
angle that can be attained by going on the back of the power curve -
assuming that the aircraft is moving horizontally in both cases, just at
the moment of stall. 

I am not sure what value A of A will have in alerting a pilot to
stalling CONDITIONS.

Many pilots fly cross-controls as an approach technique in cross winds.
Cross controls is also good for stalling one wing (that is how we get a
tardy aerobatic bird to crisp up the snap rolls).

The un-alerted pilot may well be drawn into large cross-control
deflections during a cross wind approach, thus pretty dangerous
conditions at a modest AofA - nothing like the high nose I see during
regular stalls with similar flap setting.


The actual topic however is "stall warning"

This has saved my bacon more than once by alerting me under conditions
during which I was not expecting (ready for) a stall.  I hope it will do
so for many more pilots, many more times.

There are times (on approach) that we are tuned in to the speed and very
aware of the stalling numbers.  There are other times that we are busy
with other things and least expecting a stall - that is when the buzzer
or light earns its keep.

I recall two occasions that the red light on my Cherokee Six started
talking to me immediately after take off - only in retrospect did I
realize that the conditions on the day (runway length, DA and MAUW) gave
rise to marginal conditions that required very careful handling for the
first few seconds after leaving ground effect.  The red light however
put me on full alert - one eye on the ASI, ball dead centre, easy on the
stick and no turns.  I do not recall the deck angle (fair indication of
AofA) being anywhere close to what I would see when practicing stalls.
Who knows what.....?

The variations of stall alerts that I have experienced:  a) the Piper
/Beech type vane on the LE and b) the early Cessna "flute" type.  Both
physically detect when the airflow is getting close to breaking up at
the LE - and that is the approach of an actual stall (no matter what
else) and that is the warning I want.

Both devices report ACTUAL airflow conditions in "their" area - the area
just before the known stalling (break-away) point.  The vane or flute is
telling you that their "local" conditions are stall conditions - and if
you allow these local conditions to move another half inch father north,
you will stall (that wing?) - irrespective of anything else, air speed,
AofA, price of beer.

Maybe it is possible to extrapolate these conditions from AofA, but will
AofA take into consideration the slip (or skid), gusts etc? 

Think of the slats on a Tiger Moth - same principle, they move (are
sucked) out when conditions approach the stall.  A clear indication of
the effectiveness (sensitivity) of this action is demonstrated by the
fact that one slat will often pop out (and back in) without the other
side moving at all - maybe due to a gust or maybe the driver did not
have the ball in the centre.

Never thought about it before, but it would be constructive to go out
and fly steep turns in both directions with a bird that has stall
warning.  Is there a bias in the SW reporting with a device on one side
only?

Maybe first prize would be a stall sensor (slat or flute) on both sides.

There is no doubt that installing one on a KR will require fiddling,
Adjusting, calibrating - that can be done deliberately and safely at
altitude. Once it is set up - the builder /pilot will know exactly what
it is telling him (how much lee-way etc.)

Have a great week
Steve J



Reply via email to