"de facto"? "having in reality assumed that role"? "ergo upon test in court"?
This is gibberish. Without having to go into the legal underpinnings of the matter, the new supplier (under the conditions listed in my last post) has no duty to previous builders and therefore no liability. Ergo he keeps his shirt. Max Hardberger Admitted in California Only > It is assumed, for previous builders, the new owner will be the primary > contact > for support and new supplier defacto(having in reality assumed that role) > ergo upon test in > court has the very real possibility of losing his shirt. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "joe" <feg...@earthlink.net> > To: "KRnet" <kr...@mylist.net> > Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 2:44 PM > Subject: Re: KR>Rand/Robinson Engineering--Assumption of Liability > >
