Joe Horton wrote:

 > First off I was just pondering the requirements to get into the "real 
pilots" lounge....

Sorry about that.  That sounded a bit pretentious. I think most folks on 
this list, and certainly Joe Horton, qualify as real pilots.  My point 
was that just because a guy managed to get a pilot's license, doesn't 
necessarily mean that he managed to assimilate the differences in IAS, 
TAS, and GPS speed.  I'm not even sure the acronym GPS is even allowed 
in the standard version of flight instruction.

I plowed through my FAA written exam by buying a Gleim manual and 
cramming for three straight nights, and taking the test on the fourth 
day.  It's not that I'm  a procrastinator, but I got wind of the written 
test being given four days later, and I only had that much time to 
study.  I made a 98 on it, and the only question I missed was the most 
obvious...something like "the AWOS is reporting wind at 195 degrees, so 
do you take off on runway 180 or 360?"  I'll chalk that one up to 
checking the wrong box.

But my point is that I managed to get all the way through flight 
training in a C-172 and the subject of TAS vs IAS never came up.  So 
during first flights I too wondered why the airspeed indicator was 
reading slow at higher altitudes.  I was not a "real pilot" yet, and had 
(still have) a lot more to learn.  Anybody that's flown with me knows 
that I still have a problem figuring out the runways when I arrive at a 
new airport, although I now have a lot more information at my fingertips 
while airborne, and make a point of studying the runways while planning 
a flight.

Another point on IAS is that if your ASI is off on the low end, there's 
often nothing that can be done about it.  Mechanical gauges in 
particular likely have that limitation, and even the iEFIS in my plane 
lacks enough calibration points to deal with the low end adequately. 
I'd venture to say that most airplanes are off by 5% or more on the low 
end of the ASI scale.  Mine's off way more than that.  Cosine error of 
the pitot tube's angle of attack could account for 3.5% of it at stall.

OK, I'm back to brakes, wheels, and tires...

Mark Langford
ML at N56ML.com
http://www.n56ml.com


Reply via email to