Frank Schaefer wrote: > Matthew Woehlke schrieb: >> there is no libv4l2 on Fedora > libv4l-packes are available at least for all major distros for a long > time now (there are packages even for Fedora 8 ;) ). > It's an established library and many distros already install it by > default. I can't see any problems here.
"libv4l2" is not an established library. In fact, I have yet to see any evidence of its existence. As you apparently mean "libv4l", perhaps you should fix CMakeLists.txt to refer to the correct package. It would have saved much trouble. > I agree that it would nake sense to make the whole video-part optional. > I've already put that on my todo-list. > But enabled features must work in ALL cases, not only sometimes ! > Otherwise it is called a bug. Sure. As said, I see no problem with 'either you have libv4l or you have no video at all'. For me I am already in the 'no video at all' category because I have no video capture devices. -- Matthew Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies. -- Can anybody think of a good tagline I can steal? -- Unknown _______________________________________________ kopete-devel mailing list kopete-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kopete-devel
