Does the patch seem reasonable for at least fixing the problem of not saving/using the original image? At least as an intermediary towards a better avatar handling.
--Benson Tsai On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Gustavo Pichorim Boiko <gustavo.bo...@kdemail.net> wrote: > > Em 02/02/2009, às 17:43, Benson Tsai escreveu: > > (...) >> >> Just to clarify, when you say "save smaller icons in the original >> size", do you mean use QT to save the image? In my opinion, we should >> just save the original without touching it. This way you can preserve >> animation (if any, since QT can read animated images, but not write). > > Yes, we can simply save the original image. We just need to take care > when upscaling/adapting such images for displaying to preserve the > animation (if we ever support them in the contactlist). > >> On the other hand, the scaling done by the avatar manager is still >> expected by protocols that need to abide by that restriction. IMO, the >> protocols probably should be scaling by themselves to the necessary >> size instead of expecting the avatar manager to hand the exact right >> size (which is probably why 96x96 is used since it is the size that is >> supported across the board). > > Protocols should do the scaling (and some of them are doing already > IIRC). One thing we can do is adding a method in the avatar manager > which returns the avatar image in a specified size (which protocols > could use to get images at the desired size) > > Cheers > > Boiko > > > _______________________________________________ > kopete-devel mailing list > kopete-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kopete-devel > _______________________________________________ kopete-devel mailing list kopete-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kopete-devel
