On 4/6/2011 3:26 PM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote: > On 04/06/2011 02:05 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: >> On 4/6/2011 1:37 PM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote: >>> On 04/06/2011 12:33 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: >>>> On 4/6/2011 1:15 PM, jean-pierre charras wrote: >>>>> Le 06/04/2011 18:43, Dick Hollenbeck a écrit : >>>>>> On 04/06/2011 11:41 AM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote: >>>>>>> On 04/06/2011 11:38 AM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote: >>>>>>>> So did we go back and fix the zoom steps? I remember one step was >>>>>>>> commented >>>>>>>> out: 0.7. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It needs to be enabled now, and absolutely so on Linux. >>>>>>> Currently on Linux, if you start eeschema without loading a schematic, >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> sheet border is off screen on top and bottom, suggesting the initial >>>>>>> zoom is >>>>>>> not optimal for viewing the border. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is this intentional? >>>>>> It happens in any loading of a schematic, and any sheet change within a >>>>>> schematic also, and therefore cannot be intentional. >>>>>> >>>>> I do not have this problem. >>>>> Is it a recent issue (BestZoom() was slightly modified in eeschema to fix >>>>> issue >>>>> for zoom = 0.7) ? >>>>> >>>> I have the same problem as well when the aspect ratio of the drawing >>>> window is >>>> not close to that of the schematic page size. If wxWidgets 2.9 takes care >>>> of >>>> the non-integer zoom sizes and the problem doesn't exist on Linux or OSX, >>>> why >>>> not revert to the old behavior of best zoom and put 0.7 back into the zoom >>>> list >>>> if we are going to make wxWidget 2.9 a build requirement on windows? >>> Exactly. >>> >>> Do you know this NOT to be the case at this moment? > > > >> If you are referring to the best zoom behavior I was under the impression >> that >> JP was still sorting that out. That may have been a poor assumption on my >> part. > > I meant: > Has the code been reverted?
Not yet. If JP doesn't get to it in the next couple of days, I'll change it back. Wayne > > >> If you are talking about wxWidgets 2.9 being the required version for >> building >> kicad on windows, I wasn't aware that a decision has been made. I thought it >> was just a proposal by JP. In any event, we should create a cmake macro to >> verify the version of wxWidgets found is correct. > > On windows: 2.9.2 is required > > On linux: either 2.8 or 2.92. > > There is no practical alternative. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
